ÆTHELMEARC COLLEGE OF HERALDS - commentary archive
Letter of Intent #133
Myfanwy ferch Rhiannon

                                                                              Feast of St. Thorlac
                                                                              23 December, AS XLV                                      
 
Greetings from Myfanwy!
Herein pray find commentary on Æ LoI #133.  Everything has been conflict-checked through the October 2010 LoAR...
As always, I remain your servant and the Society’s.
 
Lady Myfanwy ferch Rhiannon
Ruth Morrisson
myfanwy@consolidated.net
 
      1. Æthelmearc, Kingdom of (new Order Name Order of Sylvan Mirror)
The docs for <Sylvan> are somewhat as given [my 2 volume edition of The Compact OED places the cite on page 3205 of Vol. II, which reproduces section Su-Sz, pp. 358-61].  The quote is correct, but the submitted spelling only dates to 1638 (grey area), in a citation from Cowley’s Love’s Riddle [sic], I.i.:
            May all the Sylvan Deityes Bee still propitious to you.
(The 1580 cite is for the form <Syluein>, cited from Greene’s Mamillia [sic]; there is also a cite from Sidney’s Arcadia [sic] from 1586 for the form <Silvan>.
The online docs for <Mirror> are as cited.  The Compact OED [vol. I, p. 1807, reproducing section , pp. 487-91] gives many alternate spellings and definitions of <mirror>: in the sense that appears to be cited from online, the closest period spellings are from Spenser’s Fairy Queen, I. iv. 10 (dated to 1590):
            And in her hand she held a mirrhour bright.
and also from Holland, Pliny [sic] II. 478:
            No plates might be driuen by the hammer, nor mirroirs made, but of
            the best and purest siluer.
In a figurative usage, the submitted spelling can be found.  Definition 4 “That which gives a faithful reflection or true description of anything” gives the sub-definition b “Used of a person. poet. [sic]”, and cites Shakespeare’s Richard III, II. ii. 51 (dated to 1594):
            But now two Mirrors of his Princely semblance, are crack’d in pieces
            by malignant death.
Similarly, in definition 5 “That which exhibits something to be imitated; a pattern; an exemplar’, with the (now obsolete) sub-definition b “Hence of persons: A model of excellence; a paragon” the submitted spelling can also be found in Shakespeare (this time from Henry V, ii. Prol 6:
            They sell the Pature now, to buy the Horse; Following the Mirror of
            all Christian Kings.
These other definitions seem particularly apropos to the apparent raison d’etre of this order.
I would think, however, that <Order of the Sylvan Mirror> would be better grammar.
 
      2. Angus Macdougal of the Debatable Lands -- Argent, three cogwheels sable.
There is a typo in the docs for the given name: the cited name is actually <Angus mac Dunec’> [Black, p. 24, sn Angus].
The docs for <Mscdougal> are as cited [Reaney and Wilson, p. 291].
The docs for the locative are also as cited.
I realize that these are cogwheels, which by definition tend to interlock, but maybe not *quite* so much as here (this is supposed to be heraldry, not machinery!) -- it probably just needs an artist’s note, though.
      possibly not clear of: Stefano da Urbino (7/04 Lochac) --- Per chevron argent and Or, three cartwheels proper.
There is a CD for changing half the field.  By Precedent, there is not a CD between a cogwheel and a Catherine’s wheel, dating back to Jaelle’s tenure as Laurel:
            [a Catherine's wheel vs a cog wheel] [sic] This conflicts .... [sic] (Caterine
            Barré de Venoix 1/98 p. 21) [sic]
Another Precedent (also from Jaelle’s tenure) gives no difference between a Catherine’s wheel and a (standard) wheel (which is presumably a cartwheel or wagon wheel).
            [a Catherine's wheel vs a wheel] [sic] This conflicts with ...   [sic] nothing
            for the difference between a wheel and a Catherine's wheel. (Katherine
            Aylwyn de Chaliers, 3/99 p. 13) [sic]
But conflict is not necessarily transitive; this is from François’ first tenure:
            [two owls addorsed] [sic] Some of the commentary noted the precedent
             stating that there is no difference between an owl turned to dexter and
            an owl affronty, and wondered if that meant there was no difference
            between an owl turned to dexter and an owl turned to sinister. The
            precedent in question, on the LoAR of August 1992, states, "The owl's
            posture has slightly changed, from statant close guardant [sic] to statant
            close affronty [sic] (which is guardant by definition) [sic]. The 'blobbiness'
            [sic] of the owl's body, and the fact that the owl is guardant in all cases,
            leads me to conclude that there is no visual difference for turning the
            owl's body affronty." [sic]  Conflict is not transitive: if A conflicts with
            B and B conflicts with C, it is not required that A must conflict with C.
            In this case, while there may not be a CD between an owl affronty
            and an owl turned to dexter, and there may not be a CD between an
            owl affronty and an owl turned to sinister, there is sufficient visual
            difference to allow a CD between an owl turned to dexter and an owl
            turned to sinister. One can thus meaningfully give a posture CD between
            respectant owls and addorsed owls, ... [sic] [Sigurd Grunewald, 11/2003,
            A-Meridies] [sic]
It isn’t clear whether a cogwheel is in conflict with a cartwheel, even though both conflict with Catherine’s wheels, so this should be forwarded to Laurel with a request for additional clarification or a ruling.
      probably clear of: Anlaf Thurketilsson (3/97 Atlantia) -- Per fess embattled sable and argent, three cogwheels counterchanged.
There is a CD for changing half the field, and there should be one for changing the tincture of half the charge group.
 
      3. Constance Glyn Dwr -- Erminois, three ravens sable.
The name registration is as cited; note that the full form of the name is <Constance Glyn D{w^}r>.
Nice armory!
     clear of: Bran Trefonin (badge, 1/03 Atlantia) -- (Fieldless) Three birds close conjoined in annulo sable.
There is a CD for field vs. fieldless and one for arrangement, but probably not one for type of bird.
      clear of: Jódís Hraefnshyrst (11/00 Caid) -- Argent, three ravens close sable, a bordure vert.
There is a CD for changing the field and one for removing the peripheral charge.
      clear of: Marco Polo (Important non-SCA arms, 12/94 Laurel) -- Argent, three roosters sable beaked and armed gules.
There is a CD for changing the field and one for type between regular-shaped birds and poultry-shaped birds.
      possibly clear of: Nicole de l'Havre des Chouettes (12/71 ??) -- Or, three barn owls [Tyto alba] affronty each perched upon an olive branch all proper.
There is a CD for changing the field; there may or may not be one for removing the branches (depending on whether they are maintained or sustained charges).  There may also be one for tincture of the birds, but there may not be one for posture.
      clear of: Anthony Iron Skull (9/96 Atenveldt) -- Erminois, two ravens close respectant a bordure dovetailed sable.
There is CD for changing the number of birds and one for removing the peripheral charge.
      clear of: Nevell Sudlow (7/10 East) -- Or, in bend three magpies proper.
There is a CD for changing the field and one for arrangement of the birds; however, by Precedent there is not a CD between a raven and a magpie; this is quoted from the July 2010 LoAR, in the commentary on Nevell’s armory registration:
            In addition, precedent says:
                  no difference is granted between a magpie and a raven. [Marguerite
                  de Saint Nazaire, May 2007, R-East] [sic]
            Therefore, there is not another CD for the type of bird.
 
      4. Edithe of the Debatable Lands
The docs for both name elements are as cited.
 
      5. Edithe of the Debatable Lands (new alternate name Eadgyth of the Debatable Lands)
OSCAR can’t find the name because the name is the previous item on the letter....
The docs for both name elements are as cited; the submitted spelling of the alternate given name appears to be dated to 1031 and 1060, and seems to be a Latin form (as well as being the main header form).  In addition, the given name can be found in Withycombe [p. 93, sn Edith], which says in the text:
            Old English Eadgyth [sic]....  A fairly common old English name which
            survived the Norman Conquest, probably because of the popularity
            of St. Eadgyth [sic] (962-84) [sic], daughter of King Edgar.  The marriage
            of Henry I to the English princess Eadgyth [sic] may have also helped to
            perpetuate the name, though she was usually known as Mathilda or Mold.          
I do question why the submitter is registering what appears to be variant forms of the same name [see #4 above].
 
      6. Edmund of Worcester -- Sable, a wyvern contourny, on a chief Or three sheafs [sic] of arrows sable fletched and ribboned gules.
The docs for the given name are mostly as cited: the cited name is as given, but it is unclear what the actual date for the name is (it is cited from something called “Hy 2 DC (L)” but I was unable to find this in the list of abbreviations [pp. lxi-lxx].  Both Reaney and Wilson and Withycombe [pp. 93-4, sn Edmond, Edmund] also date the form <Edmund(us)> to the Domesday Book, dated 1086; additionally, Withycombe cites <St. Edmund [sic] Rich>, Archbishop of Canterbury, who died in 1240).
The docs for the byname are as cited; the Domesday Book gives <Wirecestre> as the 11th century spelling [p. 1428, in the Index of Places].
The default posture of wyverns, according to Table 4 in the “Glossary of Terms” [URL: http://heraldry.sca.org/coagloss.html#default] is “statant” (which I presume in this case means that the tail is more or less as depicted here, although I’m not sure I wouldn’t describe this as being “sejant”); both legs should be down for statant.  This is not the case.  The emblazon here shows one leg raised, which would (presumably) be “passant”; a relevant Precedent dates from François’ first tenure:
            [passant vs. sejant] [sic] When quadruped postures are used to blazon
            two-legged monsters, the difference between some of these postures
            becomes blurred. While there is a CD between a sejant quadruped and
            a statant quadruped, there is no clear distinction between a wyvern
            statant and a wyvern sejant. Both legs are down, and the angle of the
            body and disposition of the tail is variable in both postures. Nor is there
            a clear distinction between a wyvern passant and a wyvern statant or
            sejant. The passant [sic] wyvern has one leg raised, as opposed to both
            legs on the ground as in the other two postures. Current precedent
            does not give difference between these postures: "[a wyvern passant vs.
            a dragon sejant] [sic]  As a wyvern passant [sic] can be equally blazoned
            as a wyvern sejant [sic], there is no CD for posture, thus there is only a
            single CD for the tincture of the wyvern." (LoAR 10/00).
                  This precedent for wyverns apparently follows our precedents
            for birds, which give no difference for raising one leg of a bird close
            or rising, interpreting it as unblazonable artist's license (LoAR April
            1992) [sic]. Continental sources such as Siebmacher and Gelre uphold
            this interpretation of bird postures, but it is harder to find evidence
            of wyvern postures. One example of a wyvern passant in Siebmacher
            (die Wörmb, f. 144) [sic] is blazoned modernly in Rietstap's Armorial
            Géneral (under Wurmb) as [sic] dragon ailé d'or, la patte dextre levée [sic]
            ("A winged dragon, the dexter paw raised") [sic] , but this is a modern
            blazon, and only one example. A counterexample showing a wyvern
            passant wings displayed is also in Siebmacher (v. Breidenstein gen.                                          Bredenbach, f. 130) [sic]. This is modernly blazoned in Rietstap as the
            first quarter of Breidbach-Bürresheim, Argent a dragon gules [sic] (not
            mentioning the raised foreleg). Again, this is only one example. Without
            clear evidence that period heralds would have considered passant and
            statant as distinct postures for wyverns, the existing precedent stands.
            [Ramiro the Sicilian, 01/2002, R-Caid] [sic]
There is also a Precedent, from François’ first tenure, in how to perhaps better describe the sheaves:
            [a sheaf of swords inverted Or banded argent] [sic] Parker, under banded
            [sic], states that the term "is used when two or more objects (e.g. a
            garb or branches of a tree) are bound together with a band of different
            tincture."  [sic] [James Irvin, 02/2004, A-Æthelmearc] [sic]
Possible reblazon: Sable, a wyvern passant contourny, on a chief Or three sheaves of arrows sable fletched and banded gules.
Possible reblazon: Sable, a wyvern sejant contourny, sinister leg raised, on a chief Or three sheaves of arrows sable fletched and banded gules.
      clear of: Elizabeth Cameron Campbell (3/98 Artemisia) -- Sable, a three-headed dragon sejant affronty wings displayed and on a chief Or three roses sable.
There is a CD for changing the dragon’s posture (but not one for type between a dragon and a wyvern) and one for changes to the tertiaries.
      probably clear of: Daffyd ap Caradoc (5/84 Atlantia) -- Sable, a wingless, legless hydra, tail nowed, Or.
There is at least one CD for adding the charged chief, and there should also be one for orientation of the primary charge (but possibly not one for posture or type)
 
      7. Gerard de Rueil
The docs for the given name are as cited (note that it is listed in the section “Masculine Names by frequency” as a variant spelling of <Girard>.
The docs for the byname are also as cited.
 
      8. Ingvarr melrakki -- Quarterly argent and gules, four fox masks counterchanged.
I don’t have Lind.  The given name can also be found in Geirr Bassi [p. 12], with one instance given from the Landdnámabók.
Zöega can be found online [URL: http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~kurisuto/germanic/
oi_zoega_about.html]; the specific page is found as a tiff file [URL: http://lexicon.ff.
cuni.cz/tiff/oi_zoega/b0294.tiff]; however the form of the byname in Zöega is acually <mel-rakki> . The byname as submitted (with the meaning ‘polar fox’ can be found in Geirr Bassi [p. 25].
Slight blazon foo -- it should probably be “four fox’s masks”.
Nice armory!
      probably clear of: Sven Jonssen (1/96 Atlantia) -- Per saltire vert and sable, four talbot's heads cabossed, those in pale argent, those in fess Or.
There is a CD for changing the field, and probably one for the tincture of half the charges (but not anything for type).  There may or may be one for arrangement: the arrangement may be forced so as to not have charges overlaying the low-contrast lines of division.
      probably clear of: Refkell melrakki Einarsson (6/01 Atlantia) -- Quarterly argent and azure, four foxes' heads erased contourny counterchanged.
There is a CD for changing half the field, and probably one for the orientation of the charges; there may also be one for changing the tincture of half the charge group.
      clear of: Tighearnán Dikeman (4/02 Middle) -- Quarterly azure and vert, four wolf's heads caboshed Or.
There is a CD for changing the field and one for tincture of the charges; there is not, however, one for type of head.
      9. Rá{dh}úlf Eiríksson -- Argent, on a bend cotised vert an H-rune Or.
I can’t tell whether the given name is (as is claimed) an “orthographic variant”, but it is otherwise found in Geirr Bassi as cited.
The docs for the byname are as cited [the instructions for forming the patronymic are found on page 17].
An image of the Hagalaz, or H-rune, can be found at {URL: http://www.crystalcavern.
com/en-us/rune_stone_meanings.html].
The cotising is awfully close to the bend -- it almost looks as if there are two really tiny bendlets on the bend (or badly designed fimbriation -- and it’s too narrow to really even be that).  It probably just needs an artist’s note, though, not a redraw.
Note that when conflict checking, there were a good many registrations of armory in which there was a CD for changes to secondary charge group to the cotising, and a CD for cumulative changes to the tertiary charges.
      clear of; Eleanor de Wardon (5/88 Atlantia) -- Argent, on a bend cotised between two pears vert, a wingless dragon passant argent.
      clear of: Kieran de Sainte Claire (4/90 Caid) -- Argent, on a bend vert, cotised purpure, between two thistles, slipped and leaved, proper, three Latin crosses palewise argent.
In each case there is a CD for removing one set of secondary charges (the cotising being a separate charge group) and one for cumulative changes to the tertiary charge.
      clear of: Rolf of Esterfen (5/98 West) -- Argent, on a bend vert a paw print palewise argent.
There is a CD for adding the secondaries and one for cumulative changes to the tertiary.
      probably clear of: Rodrigo Peregrino de Navarra (8/04 Atlantia) -- Argent, on a bend vert between two falcons striking gules, a sword Or.
      probably clear of: Myrddin ap Maelgwn Coed Du (5/04 Middle) -- Argent, on a bend vert between two sprigs of three holly leaves in pall vert fructed gules, a lion courant tail nowed Or.
In each case there is at least one CD for changes to the secondaries; because these are simple armory, there should also be a CD (by X.4.j.ii) for type of tertiary.
      possibly clear of: Pamela of the Gardens (7/74 ??) -- Argent, upon a bend vert a stalk of wheat Or, all between two roses gules, barbed and seeded proper
There is a CD for adding the cotises; there may be one for cumulative changes to the tertiaries (but not X.4.j.ii, since there is more than one type of tertiary)..
      clear of: Reinald van Milant (2/94 Drachenwald) -- Ermine, on a bend cotised vert, three sickles Or.
There is a CD for changing the field and one for cumulative changes to the tertiary charge group.
      clear of: Owen Hell (7/98 Ansteorra) -- Argent, on a bend gules cotised vert, three leaves Or.
There is a CD for changing the tincture of the bend, and one for cumulative changes to the tertiary charge group.
 
      10. Saint Swithin’s Bog, Barony of (new badge for the Baronial Youth Award) -- Argent, a stand of cattails slipped and leaved proper within an annulet per pale azure and sable. [originally blazoned Per pale azure and sable, on a roundel argent a stand of cattails slipped and leaved proper.] 
I presume the blazon was changed to better match the emblazon, since this is obviously not a per pale field.
 
Complexity count of seven (five tinctures, two types of charges)
Possible blazon foo -- their other registered armory are blazoned as having “a stalk of three cattails...”.  Is there a functional difference between blazons?  If not, then it should probably be changed to correct their other armory blazons.
Possible reblazon: Argent, a stalk of three cattails slipped and leaved proper within an annulet per pale azure and sable.
      clear of: Rokeclif, Shire of (badge, 5/02 Middle) -- (Fieldless) A cattail slipped and leaved proper.
There is a CD for field vs. fieldless, and one for adding the annulet.
      possibly clear of: Elizabeth Idlewine (badge for Castle Marécage, 2/86 East) -- Argent, a bulrush slipped and leaved within a bordure vert.
There is at least one CD for changing the type and tincture of secondary/peripheral charge. However, there may not be one for type (since cattails and bulrushes are both sorted in the O&A under the category “Plant-Reed”, and therefore presumably not a CD apart).  There may also not be one for tincture, since the cattail in the new submission is predominantly vert.
      probably clear of: Styrbjørg Ulfethnar (4/82 Atlantia) -- (Tinctureless) A kraken environed of an annulet. [Octopus vulgaris]
There may be a CD for field vs. fieldless, and there should be one for type of primary charge [c.f. PIC-DIC, figs. 451 and 452 for “kraken” and also “octopus”).
 
      11. Saint Swithin’s Bog, Barony of (badge for the Populace) -- Per pale azure and sable, a stand of three cattails slipped and leaved Or.
Possible blazon foo -- their other registered armory are blazoned as having “a stalk of three cattails...”.  Is there a functional difference between blazons?  If not, then it should probably be changed to correct their other armory blazons.
Possible reblazon: Per pale azure and sable, a stalk of three cattails slipped and leaved Or.
Nice badge!
      possibly clear of: Maythen Gervaise (badge for Diana FitzWilliam, 4/84 West) -- Azure, a nine-branched camomile plant radiant from center, Or.
      possibly clear of: Baldric of Falkonmore (badge, 2/04 Atlantia) -- Per pale sable and vert, a sprig of ash Or.
      possibly clear of: Brendoken, Barony of (3/06 Middle) -- Per pale vert and sable, an alder sprig fesswise reversed Or.
      possibly clear of: Theodora di Lupita (2/85 East) -- Purpure, vêtu erminois, a sprig of two touch-me-not flowers, slipped and leaved, Or.
      possibly clear of: Grane the Golden of Hippogriff Tower (9/71 ??) -- Sable, three stalks of wheat as in a garb, Or.
In each case there is a CD for changes to the field and possibly one for type
      clear of: Iron Bog, Barony of (badge, 5/02 East) -- Per pale sable and argent, a cattail plant with two cattails counterchanged.
      clear of: Llywelyn Gruffydd of Elfsea (9/94 Ansteorra) -- Vert, three cattails slipped and leaved conjoined at the base argent.
In each case there is a CD for changes to the field and one for tincture.
 
      12. Saint Swithin’s Bog, Barony of (badge [tentatively] for the Award of Palus Amicus] -- Sable, two hands couped conjoining in fess supporting a stand of cattails slipped and leaved Or, in base a ford argent.
This is not “a ford argent”.  This is “a ford” -- the definition of which is a base [wavy] barry wavy argent and azure (or azure and argent, depending on what the field tincture is).
Parker [p. 305, sn Hand] says:
                  Sometimes hands are represented as clasping [sic] or embracing [sic];
            and with French heralds two hands joined thus are simply bla- [sic] zoned
            une foi [sic. 
There is a Precedent from Shauna’s tenure which says:
            [Vert, a pavilion Or and in chief a foi argent] [sic] There was some discussion
            about the charge in chief. As cited on the LoI, a foi [sic] was blazoned as
            such as early as July 1993 in the registration for Lothar Freund's device:
            Vert, a fess embattled counterembattled between a foi and a bull's head caboshed
            Or. [sic] [Isabeau Eaglestone of Glinwood and Vivienne de Lampérière,
            05/04, A-Caid] [sic]
Not knowing offhand what the cited registration looks like, I’m not certain whether the hands are issuant from the sides (as depicted in the margin illustration in Parker for the arms of Warton) or not (as in the new submission).  I suspect that regardless, this probably should be blazoned as a foi couped
Complexity count of seven (four tinctures, three types of charges).
Possible reblazon -- Sable, a stalk of three cattails sustained (?) in pale by a foi couped Or, and a ford.
Possible reblazon -- Sable, a stalk of three cattails sustained (?) in pale by a foi Or, and a ford.
      clear of: Costanza di Firenze (badge for House Hidden Fire, 5/82 Meridies) -- Sable, a pair of hands fesswise couped conjoined Or, armed and cupping a flame gules.
There is a CD for changes to the charges the hands are holding, and one for adding the peripheral charge.
 
      13. Silva Vulcani, Shire of -- Argent, an anvil sable and on a chief gules three laurel wreaths Or.
The docs for <silva> appear to be as cited; note that one must apparently use the English word in the Search argument box, not the Latin one, unless you uncheck the “Case insensitive” box.
               The docs for <Vulcani> appear to be as cited.
I have no idea if the grammar is correct or not (for example, I don’t know whether Latin genitive forms vary for gender -- or whether <mount> and <forest> even *are the same gender); hopefully someone with a knowledge of Latin will weigh in; otherwise, I recommend that this be forwarded with a request for assistance.
Maybe the third time *is* the charm..... Very cool docs for <Vulcani>, BTW -- especially the map (although it took a really long time to load for some reason).
Nice armory!  Note that the complexity count is seven (four tinctures, three types of charges).
      clear of: Edric of Scardburgh (3/02 Atlantia) -- Argent, a double-horned anvil sable and on a chief vert a straight trumpet Or.
      clear of: Antonio de Armado (4/91 Atlantia) -- Argent, an anvil sable, on a chief azure, two hammers, heads to center, argent.
In each case there is a CD for changing the tincture of the chief and one for cumulative changes to the tertiaries
      clear of: Wilhelm Smydele von Soelinge (4/06 Æthelmearc) -- Argent, a double-horned anvil sable within a bordure vert.
There is at least one CD for changing the type and tincture of peripheral charge, and one for adding the tertiary charge group.
      clear of: Sven Gunnarsson of Fjathrundaland (1/99 Drachenwald) -- Argent, an armorer's anvil sable and a chief embattled gules.
There is a CD for removing the complex line of division on the chief, and one for adding the tertiaries.
 
      14. Uilliam Mac an t-saoir -- Azure, a tree eradicated or, on a chief embattled argent a wolf courant sable.
The docs for both name elements are as cited.
Is the eradication of the tree sufficient?  I’ve seen really detailed branching (almost to the point of being a mirror image of the branches).  I *think* it’s okay, but I’m not entirely sure.  Also, do we need to specify the type of tree?  The default rounded-shape tree is an oak, but these are obviously not oak leaves; I think that these may be default leaf shapes, though, so we might want to get a clarification.....
There have been several instances recently of this type of non-symmetric embattlements on chiefs.  In at least one of them I was asked to redraw the submission before it was forwarded to Laurel.... (Just saying.)
Complexity count is seven (four tinctures, three types of charges).
 
      clear of: Anna Raynen(5/09 Artemisia) -- Azure, a tree Or issuant from a mount argent charged with a trefoil knot azure.
There is a CD for changing the type of peripheral charge, and one for changes to the tertiary charges; there may also be one for adding the complex line of division.  There is not one for type of primary charge however.
      clear of: Della Rovere, Dukes of Urbino (Important non-SCA arms, 12/94 Laurel) -- Azure, an oak tree eradicated its four branches knotted in saltire Or.
There is a CD for adding the chief and another for adding the tertiary to it; there may also be one for adding the complex line of division.  There may or may not be one for the type of tree; there is an depiction of the arms online [URL: http://en.wikipedia.
org/wiki/File:Coat_of_arms_of_the_House_of_della_Rovere.svg] which shows what is  a (somewhat stylized) fructed oak tree, in which the branches obviously intertwine.
      clear of: Betva a Bedwyn (1/05 Atenveldt) -- Vert, a birch tree argent leaved Or, a bordure of knotwork argent.
There is a CD for changing the field, and at least one for changing the type of peripheral charge; there may or may not be one for the partial change of tincture of the tree.
      clear of; Sian verch Gwilim ap Lewelin (2/07 Atlantia) -- Azure, a tree blasted and eradicated or, on a chief argent three pheons sable.
There is a CD for adding the complex line of division to the chief and one for changes to the tertiary charge group.  There may not be a CD for the type of tree, however; this Precedent is from François’ first tenure:
            ... no difference between a tree and a tree blasted: "There is no CD
            between a tree eradicated and a tree blasted and eradicated, as noted
            in the August 1994 LoAR... [sic] This is because there are period
            depictions of trees with only a few leaves." (LoAR July 2000) [sic]
            [Kenric of Rohan, 03/2002, R-Meridies] [sic]
This appears to overturn an earlier Precedent set in Bruce’s tenure:
            [A tree eradicated and in chief a <charge>] [sic] This is clear of [A tree
            blasted and eradicated] [sic]. There's a CD for the charge in chief, and
            a CD for the blasting of the tree. (Sileas ni Chinaid, May, 1993, pg. 4)
            [sic]
 
      15. Úrsúla of Rouen (name change from Katerina Alleye) -- Per chevron sable and azure, a chevron inverted Or between two dogwood blossoms argent seeded Or.
I don’t have Lind, but the Geirr Bassi docs for the given name are as cited; the name is specifically noted to be of Christian origin.  Withycombe [p. 286] gives it as a header form; a dated citation for the submitted spelling is not given, but it says:
            Latin diminutive of ursa [sic] ‘she-bear’ [sic].  The legend of St. Ursula [sic]
            and the 11,000 virgins was popular in the Middle Ages, and the name was
            fairly common.
Reaney and Wilson [p. 463, sn Ursell] gives the masculine name <Ursellus [sic] de Busco>, dated to 1200.  I was unable to find the name in a French context, however.
The Dauzat and Rostaing docs for the byname are somewhat as given: the submitted spelling is a header form, but dated citations include the forms <Ratomagos [sic]>, dated to the 11th century; <Ratumagus [sic]>, <Rotomagus [sic]>, <Rauranum [sic]>, and Rarauna  [sic]> (all 4th century forms); the subheader form <Ruan [sic]> is dated to 1233, in the form <de Rothomago [sic]>.  The closest to the submitted spelling is the undated ethnic form <Rouennais [sic]>.  The locative form <de Rouen> can be found at Uckelman’s “Names in the 1292 census of Paris” [URL: http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/names/
french/1292paris.pdf] which is a re-presentation of an 1837 edition of the census by Hercule Géraud.  Additionally, the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle [p.293, in the “Index of Places”also gives the form <Rotomagus> (cited in the text in a Latin format [p. 11, from “The Laud Chronicle” (E)]:
                  311.  St [sic] Silvester, the twenty-third pope.  Huius tempore
            celebratur Nicenum concilium, Arelatense quoque prinum, in quo
            fuit Auitianus Rotomagi archiepiscopus.
This appears to be something about the Nicene Council relating to someone (Autianus?) being made Archbishop of Rouen, if you believe Intertran working between Latin and English).  The “Index of Places” [op. cit.] also gives the form <Ro{dh}em>, which is translated into <Rouen> in the text [p. 253, also citing the “The Laud Chronicle” (E):
                  1124.  King Henry spent the whole of this year in Normandy, on
            account of the hostilities he was engaged in against King Louis of
            France and the count [sic] of Anjou, but most of all against his own
            subjects.
                  Then on the feast of the Annunciation of St [sic] Mary [25 March]
            [sic], it happened that Waleran, count [sic] of Meulan, went from one
            of his castles, called Beaumont-le Roger, to another of his castles, called
            Vatteville.  With him went Almaric, the seneschal of the king [sic] of
            France, Hugh Fitz Gervase, Hugh of Montfort, and many other brave
            knights.  Then the king’s knights from all the castles round about came
            against them and fought with them and put them to flight, taking
            prisoner count [sic] Waleran, Hugh Fitz Gervase, Hugh of Montfort,
            and twenty-five other knights, and brought them to the king.  The king
            had count [sic] Waleran and Hugh Fitz Gervase imprisoned in the castle
            at Rouen, but sent Hugh of Montfort to England.
      no conflicts found
 
Bibliography:
[no author]  The Compact Edition of the Oxford English Dictionary: Complete Text
      Reproduced Micrographically [2 Vol.].  Oxford, London, et. al.: Oxford University
      Press, 1971, 1981.
 
Black, George F. The Surnames of Scotland: Their Origin, Meaning, and History. 
      Edinburgh: Birlinn Ltd., 1999, 2004 [copyright: The New York Public Library,
      1946].
 
Bruce Draconarius of Mistholme [Bruce Miller] and Akagawa Yoshio [Kevin Munday]. 
      A Pictorial Dictionary of Heraldry As Used in The Society for Creative Anachronism,
      2nd Ed., 1992. 
 
Dauzat, A. and Ch. Rostaing.  Dictionnaire étymologique des noms de lieux en France,
      2nd. Ed.  Paris: Librairie Guénégaud, 1963, 1978.
 
Garmonsway, G. N. (trans.).  The Anglo-Saxon Chronicle, Rev. Ed.  London: J. M. Dent
      & Sons, Ltd.; and New York: E. F. Dutton & Co Inc., 1953, 1960.  [Everyman's
      Library #624].
 
Geirr Bassi Haraldsson [G. Fleck].  The Old Norse Name.  Olney, MD: Yggssaldr Press,
      1977.  [Studia Marklandia I]
 
http://heraldry.sca.org/heraldry/laurel/precedents.html
 
http://heraldry.sca.org/heraldry/loar/
 
http://oanda.sca.org
 
http://www.ellipsis.cx/~liana/sca/weirdness_table.html
 
http://www.s-gabriel.org/names           
 
http://www.scadian.net/heraldry/daud.html
 
Ó Corráin, Donnchadh, and Fidelma Maguire.  Irish Names.  Dublin: The Lilliput Press,
      1981. 1990.
 
Reaney, P. H. and R. M. Wilson.  A Dictionary of English Surnames, Rev. 3rd Ed. 
      Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.
 
Williams, Ann and G .H. Martin (eds.).  Domesday Book: A Complete Translation. 
      London and New York: Alecto Historical Editions (Penguin Books), 1992, 2002.
 
Withycombe, E. G.  The Oxford Dictionary of English Christian Names, 3rd Ed. 
      Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.
 
other URLs as cited