ÆTHELMEARC COLLEGE OF HERALDS - commentary archive
Letter of Intent #85
Myfanwy ferch Rhiannon


Feast of St. Oswald of Worcester
28 February, AS XXXIX

Greetings from Myfanwy!
Enclosed pray find commentary for Æ LoI #85. I was probably overly conservative in conflict checking, but over-conservative is better than missing things that should have been called. Conflict checking included the LoARs through August 2004, the most recently posted on the Laurel website.
Part of the reason that this letter is being sent in at the last minute is that I was originally unable to access the website cited for #9. Retrying it this morning got me to it without problems, so I was able to double-check the cited information.
I remain your servant and the Society’s.

Lady Myfanwy ferch Rhiannon
Ruth Morrisson
myfanwy@nauticom.net

1. Æthelmearc, Kingdom of (order name and badge) -- Ordre du Cheval de Fer
(Fieldless) A horseshoe argent.
While not a period citation by any stretch of the imagination, consulting a modern French-English dictionary seems to suggest that while the basic definition/translation of “fer” does mean “iron” it also may specifically “shoe”, i.e., “horseshoe”; checking the English half under “horseshoe” seems to indicate that the correct grammar would be “fer à cheval” [as a masculine noun] and “en fer à cheval” [as an adjective].
I do question the desire for the meaning “iron horse” since that really makes me think of a locomotive, or possibly even an automobile!
The orientation of the horseshoe is by SCA and mundane default (c.f., PIC-DIC, fig. 396).
no conflicts found

2. Alric of the Mists (resub) -- Per bend sinister purpure and sable, a wyvern sejant within a bordure embattled Or.
The bordure should be a bit wider (although the spacing of the battlements is good), even if the wyvern is made a bit smaller as a result.
I kept changing my mind about how best to blazon the posture of the wyvern. Because of the position of the tail, it isn’t precisely “sejant” (c.f. PIC-DIC, fig. 248) , but the wyvern is not really upright enough otherwise to be reblazoned as “erect” (c.f. PIC-DIC, fig. 133, which is the depiction of a cockatrice erect -- the tail is more like the submission but the legs are raised. An additional complication is that the emblazon for a basilisk (PIC-DIC, fig. 132) is said to be “statant”, which appears to differ from “sejant” in that the tail is slightly raised, and not on the same level as the feet. There is a wyvern shown in von Volborth (p. 43, fig. 335), which has one leg up and the curl of the tail at the same level (more or less, due to the shape of the shield) with the other leg; I can only surmise that this is supposed to be “passant” because it assuredly is not either sejant or erect. Parker (pp. 122-23. sn Cockatrice) show the arms of Drake, but no specific posture is blazoned, i.e., it is merely blazoned as “a wyvern”. The arms of Rudings show a wyvern “volant” (which could just as easily, IMO, be blazoned as “statant”) but is quite different from the submission in that the legs are down but the tail is extended out straight with a small curl or loop towards the end of it. The illustration on p. 123 appears to be. at best guess, “passant” but also does not have a blazoned posture: it is said to be ”from one of the supporters of the arms of KENNEDY [sic], co. Ayr.” Woodward (p. 292) says:
The DRAGON [sic] of Foreign Heraldry [sic] corresponds with the WYVERN
[sic] of British Armory [sic], having only two legs, and being usually represented
with its tail nowed in a circle. The arms of DRAKE [sic] of Devonshire are blazoned.
Argent, a wyvern, its wings displayed, and the tail nowed gules; [sic] but these are
obviously armes parlantes [sic], and the charge is the dragon [sic] of foreign armory
(Plate XXVII, fig. 8) [sic].
Note, however, that the emblazon cited by Woodward appears to be identical in posture to that of the arms of Drake found in Parker. Additionally, the same plate in Woodward has the arms of Tucker (fig. 11), which has [heraldic] sea-horses on it (another creature that has two legs and a tail); these do not a a posture blazoned in the text (p. 199) but in the emblazon they seem to be almost couchant (naiant?) -- at any rate, they do not appear to be either erect/rampant or sejant.
It isn’t entirely clear whether this should be returned for a redraw, but it certainly rates an artist’s note to the submitter. While I would not have drawn “a wyvern sejant” in this manner, I would also not have drawn either “a wyvern erect” or “a wyvern passant” like this. Whether it should be reblazoned as “statant” is a judgment call that someone else will have to make.
probably clear of: Tristan of Longford (9/96 West) -- Azure scaly argent, a dragon segreant a bordure embattled Or.
There is a CD for changing the field tincture, and probably one for change of posture. probably clear of: Suibhan ni Coinneach (10/85 East) -- Lozengy azure and argent, a dragon volant within a bordure embattled Or.
There is a CD for changing the field, and probably one for change of posture.
clear of: Muirghein Fhionn (5/98 Middle) -- Per bend sinister vert and sable, a wyvern statant between three wolf’s paw prints Or.
There is a CD for changing at least half the field, and one for changing the type and number of secondaries. Note that it isn’t clear whether there would also be one for change of posture.
clear of: Caitlin ni Chinneidigh (4/97 East) -- Per pale azure and vert, a wyvern statant wings displayed and a chief embattled Or.
There is a CD for changing the field and one for changing the type of secondary. There may or may not be one for posture, depending on how significant the wing position is.
clear of: Corwyn de Wemyss (3/97 Atlantia) -- Per pale vert and azure, a dragon passant contourny and a bordure embattled Or.
There is a CD for changing the field, and one for change of orientation (if not for change of posture as well).
clear of: Daegar Fairhair (11/88 An Tir) -- Per saltire sable and gules, a wyvern erect and in chief a Thor’s hammer, all within a bordure embattled Or.
There is a CD for changing the field, and one for adding the hammer; there is probably one for changing the posture as well.
clear of: Edric the Unsteady 687 Atenveldt) -- Vert, a cockatrice erect maintaining in its upraised dexter claw a needle palewise, point to chief, within a bordure engrailed Or.
There is a CD for changing the field and one for the type of complex line on the field. There is probably also one for posture change.
clear of: Keith of Long Shore (7/84 Caid) -- Per pale sable and gules, a sea-lion erect reguardant within a bordure dovetailed Or.
clear of: Eckhart von Eschenbach (11/88 Meridies) -- Per saltire purpure and vert, a sea-wolf erect Or, maintaining in the dexter forepaw an arrow bendwise sinister and in the sinister a bow strung bendwise argent, all within a bordure embattled Or.
There is a CD for changing the field, and one for change of posture (if not complete change of type. There is possibly also one for the the type of complex line on the bordure.

3. Chière une Clergesse -- Argent, on a chevron cotised sable three crosses clechy argent.
The documentation for both name elements are as cited. Note, however that the byname is not capitalized. I admit to being curious as to what a female “clerk/clergy below priest level” would do, but suppose it would be something like being a personal secretary to, say, an abbess.
The ends of the crosses seem a bit fat, compared to what’s in the PIC-DIC (fig. 165), but these are probably okay.
possibly not clear of: Rosemary of the Woods (8/90 Outlands) -- Argent, on a chevron sable between three sprigs of rosemary vert, three butterflies argent.
There is a CD for changing the type of secondaries, but there is only change of type of tertiary.
possibly not clear of: John Hawkwood, Sir (12/94 Laurel) -- Argent, on a chevron sable three escallops argent. [important non-SCA arms]
There is a CD for adding the cotising, but there is only change of type of the tertiaries.
clear of: Klaus von Mainz (12/01 Caid) -- Checky gules and Or, on a chevron sable five crosses formy argent.
There is a CD for changing the field, and one for adding the secondaries. Note that while there is a change of number of tertiaries, there may not be significant change of type between the two kinds of crosses.
clear of: Alison Shana Rhys (10/79 Meridies) -- Or, on a chevron between two chevronelles [sic] sable four ermine spots in cross Or.
There is a CD for changing the field tincture, and one for significant changes to the tertiaries. Note, however, that I suspect that the “chevronelles” are probably reblazonable as cotises.

4. Coeddu, Shire of (resubs) -- Argent, a tree blasted and eradicated sable within a laurel wreath vert and on a chief sable three mullets argent.
According to my Welsh-English Dictionary, “coed” is a feminine plural noun form of “coeden”, meaning tree. Granted, it’s modern Welsh, but the plural of “du” is “duon” and I also don’t know whether it would get modified by lenition or in some other way for the gender. Otherwise, the docs seem okay.
probably clear of: Yarnvid, College of (6/95 Atlantia) -- Argent, a harp reversed sable within a laurel wreath vert, on a chief sable three goblets argent.
There should be X.2 [X.1?] between a tree and a harp; there is, however, only change of type of tertiary.
probably clear of: Wynterset, Stronghold of (Æthelmearc, 1/04) Argent, a winged stag’s head affronty erased at the shoulder wings displayed azure within a laurel wreath vert and on a chief sable three mullets of eight points argent.
There should be X.2 [X.1?] between a tree and a harp; however, I’m not sure you get much, if anything for the tertiaries.
clear of: Meghan of Laurel Wood (12/89 West) -- Argent, a weeping willow tree eradicated proper, on a chief sable, three Celtic crosses argent.
There is a CD for changing the tincture of the tree, if not for changing the type of tree; there is also a CD for adding the laurel wreath.
probably clear of: Christiana Blackhurst (2/95 West) -- Argent, three oak trees and on a chief sable three acorns argent.
There is a CD for changing the number of trees, and one for adding the laurel wreath; note that there is only change of type of tertiary on the chief, however.
probably clear of: Myrgan Wood, Barony of (10/83 Middle) -- Argent, an elm tree eradicated proper, leaved gules, within a laurel wreath and on a chief vert three maple leaves argent.
There is a CD for changing the tincture of the chief and probably one for changing the tincture (if not the type) of the tree; note that there is only change of type of tertiary.

5. Donecan de Maccuswel (appeal of return of household name Clann Maccuswael)
Sigh. Obviously, nothing can really be done at this level. Appeals automatically get kicked upstairs to Laurel (I presume that since it was a Pelican return it will be re-decided by Wreath). Note, however, that in nearly all of the cited registrations there does not appear to be a real, mundane clan of that name -- even though the names Baldwin, MacFergus, and McBride all appear as entries in Black. (I discount “Clan Stewart of Grandloch” because while there are various branches of the Stewarts, the Stewarts “of Grandloch” is not one of them; additionally, this is a 15 year old registration, so all bets are off). The same can *not* be said for Clan Maxwell (c.f., Grimble, pp. 211-12, sn Maxwell), which is quite real. [THL Roana’s commentary seems to say pretty much the same thing, but more eloquently.]
Mostly for curiosity, I looked up the LoAR commentary for Clann Cléirigh, which says in part:
Cléirigh [sic] is the genitive form of the Gaelic name Cléirech [sic]. So Clann Cléirigh [sic] literally
means 'children [of] Cléirech [sic] ' or 'Cléirech's [sic] children'.
This seems to be a completely different type of derivation than that for the original documentation for “Clann Maccuswael”. Furthermore, it, like the cites from Black, does not appear to be the name of a real, mundane clan.

6. George Anne (badge) -- (Fieldless) A frog tergiant inverted argent.
clear of: Karl Rasmussen of Tvede (badge, 9/90 East) --(Fieldless) A frog gules.
There is a CD for fieldless vs. fieldless, and one for the tincture of the frog (note that it isn’t clear from the blazon what the frog’s posture is, and that if it were argent, it might be a conflict.
no conflicts found

7. Keran Roslin (badge) -- (Fieldless) A heart per pale azure and argent.
no conflicts found

8. Keran Roslin (badge) -- Argent, a heart gules within a bordure invected azure.
clear of: Margaret Menteith (9/97 Artemisia) -- Argent semy of keys inverted sable, a heart gules a bordure embattled azure.
There is a CD for adding the semy, and one for changing the type of complex line on the bordure.
probably clear of: Edmundo da Monreale (11/97 Æthelmearc) -- Argent, a heart enflamed to chief gules within an annulet azure.
There is a CD for changing the bordure to an annulet; there is probably one for adding the flames to the heart, but it might be worth pulling the paperwork to see how significant the flaming actually is.
possibly clear of: Caitlín Nic Mhaoláin of Gleanntaigh (5/94 Caid) -- Argent, two birds migrant respectant fesswise azure holding in their beaks a heart gules, a bordure invected azure.
There is a CD for adding the birds; it isn’t clear whether the heart is a secondary or a co-primary with them
probably clear of: Patrice du Coeur Fidel (10/89 West) -- Argent, upon a heart gules another Or, within a bordure engrailed azure.
There is a CD for adding the tertiary; there is probably also one for changing the complex line on the bordure, but because is is changing from invected to engrailed, that isn’t a certainty.
clear of: Yelena Duvelle (12/91 Atlantia) -- Argent, semy of hearts gules within a bordure azure.
There is a CD for changing the number of primary charges and one for changing the type of line on the bordure.

9. Minamoto no Taikawa Saiaiko
The cited website documentation is as given. Additionally, “Mi’namoto” is found in Solveig (2nd ed., p. 322) as a historical surname dated to 1147.
The element “TAI” is found in Solveig (op. cit. p. 101), dated to 1332 as (if I understand the notations correctly) an element found in the female name “Taifu”. “Kawa” is found in Solveig (op. cit., pp. 150-51) and most often (but not exclusively) seems to be the second element; the closest analogy would be a deuteromene in Old English but I’m not entirely sure it is an accurate one. Note that two different kanji seem to be used: one means “river” and the other means “large river” (specifically the Yellow River in China). The earliest dated citation for the former is 1183, in the name “Ishikawa”, which appears to be a surname.
I cannot find “Saiai” as an independent name or name element. I can find separate name elements. “Sai” is in Solveig (p. 104), as an element meaning “west” and dated to 765 in the Nara period in the name [I can’t tell what type] “Sai-dai’ji” (with the added meaning of “big + temple”) and dated to 1332 in the (apparent) surnames “Kasai” (meaning “arrowroot” and “Kouzai” (meaning “incense”). It is also found as an element meaning “three” -- but only dated to 1600 -- in the (I think) surname “Saigusa (with the added meaning of “branch/twig”), and as an element meaning “worship/
study” in the (surname?) “Saitou”, dated to 1332 and having the additional meaning “wisteria”. “Ai” is found (op. cit., p. 226) as element meaning “weak/pale/thin” (as in tea) in the (presumed) name “Aikawa”, dated to 1332; note that it has the added meaning “large river”. It is also found (op. cit., p. 186) as an element meaning “team-work/together” in the male nanori (?) name Yosh’aii (dated to 1600 and with the added meaning of “good/superior”) and the post-period surname “Aizawa”. Additionally, “Ai”, meaning ‘love”, is found as an independent (and historical) female name dated to 1600 (op. cit., pp. 255 and 374).
So what does this all mean in the long run for this submission? I can’t document most of this name for the time period the submitter requests (late 1100’s), but the bulk of it does seem to be before 1600 (mostly to the Kamakura period, early to mid-14th century). I also am not sure of its correct construction and grammar. My advice would be to send it up to Laurel with a request for further assistance, particularly from THL Solveig herself as the expert in such matters.

10. Thorin bjarnkarl (resub) -- Or, a bear rampant maintaining a mace and on a chief gules three Edelweiss blossoms argent.
There is no picture of an edelweiss blossom found in the PIC-DIC However, searching back to saved commentary from the original submission (on Æ #75) yielded a previous Google search [URL http://www.google.com], netting a website that has a photo of edelweiss flowers [URL: http://www.echemical.net/edel_story.htm].
The bear is holding a flanged mace, BTW (c.f., PIC-DIC, fig. 486b), although as a maintained charged it might not particularly matter.
Nice armory.
possibly not clear of: Arthur Red (4/03 Caid) -- Argent, a bear rampant and on a chief gules three Latin crosses formy argent.
There is a CD for changing the field tincture. There is only change of type of the tertiaries on the chief, not number or tincture; there is nothing for the maintained charge.
clear of: Vladimir Igorevich (5/98 Outlands) -- Or, a bear rampant gules maintaining an axe sable, on a chief indented azure three Russian Orthodox crosses argent.
There is a CD for changing the tincture of the chief, and one for adding the complex line to it. Note that there is probably nothing for the maintained charge (even with a different tincture) and there is only change of type of tertiaries on the chief.
clear of: Eirik Rødbjørn (10/85 East) -- Or. a grizzly bear salient gules, maintaining a mullet within a bordure azure.
There is a CD for changing the bordure to a chief, and one for adding the tertiaries. There possibly is not one, however, for the bear’s posture.

Bibliography:

Atkins, Beryl T., Alain David, Hélène M. A. Lewis and Rosemary C. Milne.
HarperCollins Robert French College Dictionary, 3rd.Ed. New York: HarperCollins,
Publishers; and Paris: Dictionnaires Le Robert, 1993, 1997.

Black, George F. The Surnames of Scotland: Their Origin, Meaning, and History.
Edinburgh: Birlinn Ltd., 1999, 2004 [copyright: The New York Public Library, 1946]

Bruce Draconarius of Mistholme [Bruce Miller] and Akagawa Yoshio [Kevin Munday].
A Pictorial Dictionary of Heraldry As Used in The Society for Creative Anachronism,
2nd Ed., 1992.

Grimble, Ian. Scottish Clans & Tartans. New York: Harmony Books, 1973.

http://oanda.sca.org

http://www.sca.org/heraldry/loar

Lewis, Edwin C. Welsh Dictionary. Lincolnwood (Chicago), IL: NTC Publishing Group,
1961. [Teach Yourself Books]

Parker, James. A Glossary of Terms Used in Heraldry. Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle Co., Inc., 1970.

Solveig Throndardottir [Barbara Nostrand]. Name Construction in Medieval Japan,
Rev. Ed. Columbia, MO: Potboiler Press, 2004.

von Volborth, Carl-Alexander. Heraldry: Customs, Rules and Styles. Poole, Dorset:
Blandford Press, 1981, 1984.

Woodward, John, and George Burnett. Woodward's Treatise on Heraldry, British and
Foreign. Rutland, VT: Charles E. Tuttle Co., Inc., 1969, 1971.

other URLs as cited